The mechanical merge preserved both histories but left two repositories
sitting side by side rather than one repository. This is the part that
makes it whole.
A top-level README explains the three strands - the telescope network
and campaign, the processing code, and in-person observing plans - and
says plainly that image data does not live here, because that is the
first question anyone will have when they find a pipeline with no
pixels.
state/PROJECT.md was still describing a markdown-only reference project
whose scope explicitly EXCLUDED automating bookings and image
processing. Both of those are now most of what the project does, so the
objective, scope and key facts are rewritten to match reality.
state/DECISIONS.md records why the merge happened - the two repos were
split by chronology rather than design, and the seam was already
leaking, with the campaign's TODO citing results held in the other repo
and the pipeline's README explaining a campaign it did not contain. It
also records that the image data deliberately stays out of the
repository.
state/TODO.md gains the pipeline and observing work that previously had
nowhere to live, including the measurement that changes the pipeline
plan: per-frame processing is 2.9 seconds and the whole 24-frame session
is 1.1 minutes single-threaded, so a scheduler earns nothing on stacking
and should be pointed at the Monte Carlo stages instead.
Internal links fixed for the new paths: pipeline/README.md referred to
session-scripts/ throughout, and itelescope/README.md pointed at a
state/ directory that is now one level up.
The .gitignore conflict between the two repositories is resolved by
combining them, with image formats ignored globally except under docs/,
where documentation figures are committed deliberately.
Preparing to merge this repository into a combined astrophotography
repo. session-scripts/ becomes pipeline/ because the scripts import
layout.py from their own directory and must stay together, and because
'pipeline' says what it is rather than how it came about. observing/
stays at the top level: observing plans are not processing code.
