Persists the branding/commercial/infrastructure work (previously only in chat and on the live site) into version control. What changed: - docs/naming.md: due-diligence and the decision to brand the product Nightjar (OpenScribe domain/GitHub/trademark collisions; alternatives screened; why Nightjar). - docs/hosted-service.md: the commercial model - plan tiers (Self-host / Cloud Starter / Cloud Pro / Private), indicative pricing, backend mapping, and the build-to-sell roadmap (metering, billing, provisioning, DPA). - docs/infrastructure.md: backend infra plan. Primary option = self-host on the 3x Minisforum MS-02 cluster (one with an RTX 3050 6GB) fronted by a Cloudflare Tunnel, with node roles, the 3050 capacity reality, caveats, and a Hetzner cloud fallback. Provision-later. - site/: reproducible marketing-site source - block content for all 11 pages (rebranded to Nightjar), the navigation, the Contact Form 7 config (honeypot), the ApisCP SOAP helper (tools/apiscp.php, no secret), and a README on how the WordPress site is built and managed via the API. - state/: DECISIONS (Nightjar rebrand, hosted service, MS-02 backend), PROJECT (brand + commercial section), TODO (rename decision, trademark, mailbox, pricing, hosted-service build, infra provisioning). Why: - User asked to save everything to the repo. Captures the product rebrand, the commercialisation plan, and the infrastructure decision so a cold session has the full picture. Notes: - The repo is still named `openscribe`; the product/brand is Nightjar. A full codebase rename is deferred (tracked in TODO + docs/naming.md). - No secrets committed: the ApisCP API key is read from a local scratch file, never the repo. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.5 KiB
2.5 KiB
Naming and branding
Record of the naming due-diligence and the decision to brand the product Nightjar.
Reviewed July 2026.
Decision
- Product / commercial brand: Nightjar. The site is live at
https://nightjar.12hobbies.studio. - The repository is still named
openscribefor now. Renaming the whole codebase (repo, SPDX headers, firmware namespaces, docs) is a separate, larger task - deferred until decided. "OpenScribe" survives only as the original project name in code history.
Why not "OpenScribe"
"OpenScribe" failed a due-diligence screen for a commercial brand:
- Domains: every desirable exact-match is taken.
openscribe.com(parked, for sale since 2009),openscribe.ai(parked, for sale),.net/.org/.app/.devregistered,.orgis an active dictation product,.io/.cohost live sites. - GitHub: 33 repos match "openscribe", several in the same category (an AI medical scribe at ~188 stars, dictation apps, transcription tools). Heavy in-category collision.
- Trademark: descriptive ("Open" + "Scribe"), so weak/hard to register, and there is at least one live commercial product on the exact name in the same class. Not cleared.
Why "Nightjar"
- A nightjar is a bird with a famously distinctive call - evocative, memorable, and it does not collide inside the AI/voice/transcription category (the trap OpenScribe hit).
- GitHub name collisions: ~104 (vs 5,000+ for the coined alternative "Recita", and far lower than dictionary words like murmur/cadence/quill).
- As a bird name applied to AI software it is an arbitrary mark - a strong, defensible trademark position (unrelated to the goods).
Names screened and rejected
- Mockingjay - Hunger Games / Lionsgate trademark, aggressively enforced. Hard avoid.
- Lyrebird, Fathom - already established voice-AI / AI-notetaker brands (in-category traps like OpenScribe).
- Murmur, Cadence, Quill, Cairn, Keepsake - dictionary words: taken domains + heavy GitHub collisions.
- Recita - coined but turns out common (Italian word), ~5,000 GitHub matches.
Caveats / follow-ups
- Every short name has its exact-match
.comsquatted; Nightjar is no exception. Domain routes:getnightjar.com/ a modern TLD if free at a registrar / the studio subdomain (current:nightjar.12hobbies.studio). - A formal trademark clearance (USPTO / UK IPO / EUIPO, ideally via an IP attorney) is the last step before spending on the brand. This screen is not a legal clearance.